From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/22866 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexander Lazic Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Re: function plotting Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:06:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20051005090612.GB6160@none.at> References: <20051002172755.GA17649@none.at> <43401ECE.2030309@creutzig.de> <20051002185852.GB19384@none.at> <434044D5.8090109@creutzig.de> <20051003080358.GA3782@none.at> <434169BB.4000008@creutzig.de> <20051004082954.GA20838@none.at> <6faad9f00510041048l25e0b9f0m@mail.gmail.com> <43437B38.6030006@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1128503213 22138 80.91.229.2 (5 Oct 2005 09:06:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Oct 05 11:06:51 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EN5EA-0005C4-SA for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:06:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1103127F1; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:06:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06258-05-3; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:06:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17601127E8; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:06:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DED127E8 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:06:14 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06258-05-2 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:06:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from magrathea.bursik.net (magrathea.bursik.net [85.232.70.2]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A24127DF for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2005 11:06:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1001) by magrathea.bursik.net with local; Wed, 05 Oct 2005 11:06:12 +0200 id 00450745.43439784.00001AF0 Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43437B38.6030006@wxs.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on smtp.ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:22866 Archived-At: On Mit 05.10.2005 09:05, Hans Hagen wrote: > >gnuplot is great indeed, but the output is rather large; it would be >nice if there was a real good output mode (say, comparable to the >output produced by metapost: compact, parsable); Ack. >btw, is it really that difficult to use gnuplot output in context? Not really because if you use png or i think some other output fileformats. But i think you lose some benefit of metapost, or have i the wrong point of view?! Greetings al ;-)