From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/26175 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fabian Doerk Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Just another Table splitting question.. Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:41:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20060228014109.GD4036@planless.org> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1141113531 8471 80.91.229.2 (28 Feb 2006 07:58:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Feb 28 08:58:47 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FDzkk-0006bf-Db for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:58:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29748127B3; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:58:35 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 17220-04-6; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:58:32 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D027E127A0; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:58:22 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67B8712793 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:41:56 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14593-07 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:41:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from idoru.planless.org (idoru.planless.org [213.95.21.236]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 6674A12772 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:41:55 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from brainw by idoru.planless.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1FDtrS-0004ic-00 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:41:10 +0100 Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:58:20 +0100 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:26175 Archived-At: Hi ML, which is the current preferred method to get a table splitted over multiple pages within an float environment? I've tried natural tables and linetables. Both within an \placefloat, \splitfloat and outside of an float environment. Only one variant splitted the table as expected, the natural table outside of an float environment. The ML archive showed that this is a hot topic with periodically repetition. But none of the former posted question regarding this issue gets an proper answer: http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2005/010273.html http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2005/010631.html http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2004/005841.html ... Is the only solution to switch to another table implementation? The reason for preferring natural tables (or linetables) are their frame alike handling per row/column. Thanks in advance for clarifying this things.. Fabian