From: Alexander Lazic <al-context@none.at>
Subject: Q about mathml || tex-native?
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 23:38:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060317223832.GA19050@none.at> (raw)
Hi,
i plan to write a math-booklet and have a question about the
math-modules in contex.
What is the preferd way to deal with math in contex?
MathML (xml-way) or
\*formula (tex-way, from my point of view)
I'am plan the outputs to pdfs.
There are some complex (integrals, complex numbers, ...), formulas and
electionical circuits figures.
I'am not sure what is the 'best' way ;-)
Please can you tell me your thoughts and opinions ;-)
Thanks && regards
Alex
next reply other threads:[~2006-03-17 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-17 22:38 Alexander Lazic [this message]
2006-03-18 0:33 ` Aditya Mahajan
2006-03-20 10:40 ` Hans Hagen
2006-03-20 11:36 ` Alexander Lazic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060317223832.GA19050@none.at \
--to=al-context@none.at \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).