From: frantisek holop <minusf@obiit.org>
Subject: Re: pdf document info fields
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:39:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060329133950.GO15338@obiit.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <442A8A97.5090306@wxs.nl>
hmm, on Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 03:24:39PM +0200, Hans Hagen said that
> frantisek holop wrote:
> > hmm, on Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 12:52:29PM +0200, Hans Hagen said that
> >
> >>> what is the rationale behind the "Creator" pdf field context sets?
> >>>
> >>> for radnoti.tex i get:
> >>>
> >>> Creator: ConTeXt/user/radnoti.tex
> >>>
> >>>
> >> no rationale except that you can trace the pdf file back to the source
> >>
> >
> > i know this is really a non-issue, but wouldn't it make more sense
> > to put the context version here? the source file name does not make
> > much sense esp. if the document consists of more documents...
> > and i find "user" pretty much useless also, can there be something else?
> >
> in acrobat, see documentproperties -> custom
>
> ConTeXt.Version : ...
i must be blind: AR 6.0.3 windows XP SP2
document properties:
-advanced
-description
-fonts
-security
where's custom?
but i don't normally use acrobat reader at all.
i use gv and/or xpdf.
i just thought that "Creator" is a perfectly logical place
to put the Context version into, the infor which is there
now is rather "academic" :)
-f
--
be sure not to start a tagline you can't finis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-29 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-28 23:36 frantisek holop
2006-03-28 23:43 ` frantisek holop
2006-03-30 13:52 ` Mojca Miklavec
2006-03-29 8:00 ` Taco Hoekwater
2006-03-29 10:52 ` Hans Hagen
2006-03-29 12:09 ` frantisek holop
2006-03-29 13:24 ` Hans Hagen
2006-03-29 13:39 ` frantisek holop [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060329133950.GO15338@obiit.org \
--to=minusf@obiit.org \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).