From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/27970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: frantisek holop Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: new release Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 01:19:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20060515231912.GK31904@obiit.org> References: <445F25DA.2040208@wxs.nl> <44605C57.6070905@wxs.nl> <446094FB.2040305@wxs.nl> <20060515230626.GJ31904@obiit.org> <44690BAB.2010301@wxs.nl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147735162 20543 80.91.229.2 (15 May 2006 23:19:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 23:19:22 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue May 16 01:19:20 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfmLP-0007EL-AM for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 01:19:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139B8127BA; Tue, 16 May 2006 01:19:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11069-04-3; Tue, 16 May 2006 01:19:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5E41279A; Tue, 16 May 2006 01:19:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0501F1279A for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 01:19:14 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 11069-04-2 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 01:19:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from integer.obiit.org (integer.obiit.org [195.168.92.92]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id E183712780 for ; Tue, 16 May 2006 01:19:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by integer.obiit.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7798E96F56; Tue, 16 May 2006 01:19:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44690BAB.2010301@wxs.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:27970 Archived-At: hmm, on Tue, May 16, 2006 at 01:15:55AM +0200, Hans Hagen said that > > i just did: > > > > # rm -r /usr/local/share/texmf-local/fonts/map/dvipdfm/context > > # rm -r /usr/local/share/texmf-local/fonts/map/dvips/context > > # texhash > > > > aren't these files awfully old anyway? are they needed? > > as cont-lm is not needed anymore i thought these are obsolete files... > > > the lm map files are needed (unless you have files on your syetem that > do the same); context loads map files on demand and does not use > updmap things i meant, the cont-lm zip file is not needed anymore (if i get it right) because it is now distributed with context, not that the files are not needed. do the files distributed with context make the dvip{s,dfm} files obsolete (say from teTeX-3.0)? -f -- never trust a person who says, "trust me"