From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/30532 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Schuster Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: New math feature requests Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:12:18 +0200 Message-ID: <20060828171218.851c4ddb.schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com> References: Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1156777988 12273 80.91.229.2 (28 Aug 2006 15:13:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 15:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Mon Aug 28 17:13:05 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GHinD-0001XU-9z for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:12:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE381FB6B; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:12:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31440-03-2; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:12:45 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA0A1FC84; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:12:44 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C393D1FC84 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:12:43 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 31440-03 for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:12:42 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id F13501FB6B for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:12:41 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d4so1188745nfe for ; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.48.162.15 with SMTP id k15mr9130895nfe; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from unknown ( [89.51.234.43]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 11sm4201810hug.2006.08.28.08.12.38; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.6 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:30532 Archived-At: On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 12:37:56 -0400 (EDT) Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Fri, 25 Aug 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > > On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > > > [ A long list of feature requests ] > > > > Here is something that was not in my original list: subformula > > numbering. > > > > [...] > > > > I was thinking of a better (rather more familar) way of treating > > subformulas by imitating the \begin{subequations} .... > > \end{subeqations} environment of latex. > > > > I propose a \startsubformula .... \stopsubformula environment, so > > that inside it, I will get subformula numbers rather than formula > > numbers. Having discovered conversions (see my previous mail on tagged > > formulas), I tried to implement it using conversions. The following > > straightforward approach works fine. This is just a stop gap code, I > > do not take care of inherting the right settings for formulas, but > > it conveys the idea. > > > > Hans and Taco, can something like this be added to the core? If so, I > > will try to make this macro more robust (correct inheritence, etc.) > > Here is a more robust version. I use \??sf as a namespace for > subformulas. I do not think that this is used anywhere else. I found nothing where \??sf is used in the ConText core, but it is defined as systemvariable in mult-sys line 552. --> \definesystemvariable {sf} % SpeciFics You should ask Hans if he need it. Wolfgang