* Are before=command parameters expanded?
@ 2007-01-20 21:22 Mike Bird
2007-01-21 8:46 ` Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mike Bird @ 2007-01-20 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
I noticed some strange behavior which resulted from the
fact that the before value is expanded in \setupfootnotes.
For example, the following test case will break if
\noexpand is removed:
\setupfootnotes[before=\noexpand\undefined]
\starttext
\stoptext
Is this the intended behavior or is this a bug?
Thanks,
--Mike Bird
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Are before=command parameters expanded?
2007-01-20 21:22 Are before=command parameters expanded? Mike Bird
@ 2007-01-21 8:46 ` Taco Hoekwater
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Taco Hoekwater @ 2007-01-21 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
Mike Bird wrote:
> I noticed some strange behavior which resulted from the
> fact that the before value is expanded in \setupfootnotes.
>
> For example, the following test case will break if
> \noexpand is removed:
>
> \setupfootnotes[before=\noexpand\undefined]
> \starttext
> \stoptext
>
> Is this the intended behavior or is this a bug?
It is an unavoidable a side-effect. The 'before' bit is typeset
immediately, because the height of the resulting material will
influence page breaking.
Best,
Taco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-21 8:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-20 21:22 Are before=command parameters expanded? Mike Bird
2007-01-21 8:46 ` Taco Hoekwater
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).