ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Footnotes lost in Natural Tables
@ 2007-02-04 11:28 Steffen Wolfrum
  2007-02-04 16:47 ` Gerhard Kugler
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Wolfrum @ 2007-02-04 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context

Hi,

once again I ran into a dead-end where I never dreamt it could be a 
problem: using footnotes in tables.

For my current project I have to use 16 tables, spread over the whole 
text (about 400 pages).
Some of these tables also need footnotes (sometimes quite large). But 
they should be numbered and placed within the regular footnotes at the 
end of the page.

Trying the minimal below I saw the table's footnotes got lost:

\starttext

First paragraph\footnote{One}.

 \bTABLE
      \bTR 
        \bTD Cell\footnote{Two} \eTD 
        \bTD Cell\footnote{Three} \eTD 
      \eTR  
    \eTABLE
Next paragraph\footnote{Four}.

\stoptext


As I have to weave 31 footnotes in these 16 tables I hope I don't need 
to place fake notes by hand, do I?

Steffen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Footnotes lost in Natural Tables
  2007-02-04 11:28 Footnotes lost in Natural Tables Steffen Wolfrum
@ 2007-02-04 16:47 ` Gerhard Kugler
  2007-02-04 21:35   ` Hans Hagen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gerhard Kugler @ 2007-02-04 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context

Hi,

an addition: footnotes within blocks are lost too. Numbering goes on,
but the note does not appear.

Gerhard

-- 
Gerhard Kugler
Psychotherapeut
http://www.psychotherapie-kugler.de

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Footnotes lost in Natural Tables
  2007-02-04 16:47 ` Gerhard Kugler
@ 2007-02-04 21:35   ` Hans Hagen
  2007-02-08 17:33     ` Steffen Wolfrum
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2007-02-04 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

Gerhard Kugler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> an addition: footnotes within blocks are lost too. Numbering goes on,
> but the note does not appear.
>   
has to do with inserts not possible and disappearing in boxes 

\postponefootnotes <something tabular> \flushfootnotes 

some structures have this built in 

Hans 

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
     tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Footnotes lost in Natural Tables
  2007-02-04 21:35   ` Hans Hagen
@ 2007-02-08 17:33     ` Steffen Wolfrum
  2007-02-08 21:09       ` Footnotes lost in Natural Tables (solved) Steffen Wolfrum
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Wolfrum @ 2007-02-08 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:35:40 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> an addition: footnotes within blocks are lost too. Numbering goes on,
>> but the note does not appear.
>>   
> has to do with inserts not possible and disappearing in boxes 
> 
> \postponefootnotes <something tabular> \flushfootnotes 


But this disturbs the alignment:

\midaligned{%
\bTABLE
…
\eTABLE}


When the footnotemarker is "wide" (for example 888), then the table gets shifted away from the middle!

Is there a workaround?


Steffen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Footnotes lost in Natural Tables (solved)
  2007-02-08 17:33     ` Steffen Wolfrum
@ 2007-02-08 21:09       ` Steffen Wolfrum
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steffen Wolfrum @ 2007-02-08 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:33:06 +0100, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
> On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:35:40 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>> an addition: footnotes within blocks are lost too. Numbering goes on,
>>> but the note does not appear.
>>>   
>> has to do with inserts not possible and disappearing in boxes 
>> 
>> \postponefootnotes <something tabular> \flushfootnotes 
> 
> 
> But this disturbs the alignment:
> 
> \midaligned{%
> \bTABLE
> …
> \eTABLE}
> 
> 
> When the footnotemarker is "wide" (for example 888), then the table 
> gets shifted away from the middle!


\setupindenting[no] was missing. 

Without the footnote it was centered.
With a footnote used in the table an indent for  the entire table was set.

Hm.


Steffen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-08 21:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-04 11:28 Footnotes lost in Natural Tables Steffen Wolfrum
2007-02-04 16:47 ` Gerhard Kugler
2007-02-04 21:35   ` Hans Hagen
2007-02-08 17:33     ` Steffen Wolfrum
2007-02-08 21:09       ` Footnotes lost in Natural Tables (solved) Steffen Wolfrum

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).