From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/33266 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steffen Wolfrum Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Footnotes lost in Natural Tables (solved) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:09:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20070208220957619726.d3c9d0c9@st.estfiles.de> References: <20070204122841644059.4a952f9f@st.estfiles.de> <20070204164712.GA25945@grohe.our-isp.org> <45C651AC.9090904@wxs.nl> <20070208183306707040.266f050f@st.estfiles.de> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (GMessage framework 1.5.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170969050 11791 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2007 21:10:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 21:10:50 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Feb 08 22:10:43 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HFGXQ-0007L0-JV for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:10:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6972BD; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:09:25 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14643-03-12; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:09:14 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DE52AE; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:09:13 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F23B57 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:09:05 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14643-03-11 for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:08:57 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933592AE for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 22:08:56 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: (qmail 21169 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2007 21:10:09 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO n448a.n.pppool.de) (698580@[89.50.68.138]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Feb 2007 21:10:09 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20070208183306707040.266f050f@st.estfiles.de> X-Mailer: GyazMail version 1.5.2 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:33266 Archived-At: On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:33:06 +0100, Steffen Wolfrum wrote: > On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 22:35:40 +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> an addition: footnotes within blocks are lost too. Numbering goes on, >>> but the note does not appear. >>> >> has to do with inserts not possible and disappearing in boxes >> >> \postponefootnotes \flushfootnotes > > > But this disturbs the alignment: > > \midaligned{% > \bTABLE > … > \eTABLE} > > > When the footnotemarker is "wide" (for example 888), then the table > gets shifted away from the middle! \setupindenting[no] was missing. Without the footnote it was centered. With a footnote used in the table an indent for the entire table was set. Hm. Steffen