Re: bib question

["M.J. Kallen" <mj_kallen@yahoo.com>]

--- Taco Hoekwater <taco@elvenkind.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> > 
> > thanks for your reply - even if it's bad news...
> One thought: I could  
> > use the same bbl file for all my presentations,
> right? And then fix  
> > the numbering in there. But unfortuntately, as far
> as I understand,  
> > the .bbl always contains the entire database, not
> just the quoted  
> > references. Can this behavior be influenced?
> 
> You can delete what you don't need, but everything
> is always exported
> from bibtex.  For the bib module, the .bbl _is_ the
> database. It
> considers .bib to be just another data
> representation format.

It would be nice to have an option which only puts the
cited references into the .bbl file. Now if I use the
authoryear option and I have two references from the
same author in the same year, I get either "Author
(2007a)" or "Author (2007b)" and not "Author (2007)"
in the bibliography if I only cite one of them in my
document. Now I have to remove one of the references
manually from either the .bib or .bbl files, which is
certainly not a disaster, but I do not have to do this
with LaTeX+BibTeX.

Would this be possible?

Maarten-Jan

> 
> Cheers,
> Taco
> _______________________________________________
> ntg-context mailing list
> ntg-context@ntg.nl
> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> 


Maarten-Jan

















































----


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peek at the forecast
with the Yahoo! Search weather shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#loc_weather