From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/39494 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Morgan Brassel Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:44:06 +0100 Message-ID: <200803131944.06455.morgan.brassel@free.fr> References: <20080313191602.cdd05520.schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205433990 29407 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2008 18:46:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 18:46:30 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Mar 13 19:46:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZsRy-00075Z-12 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:46:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B3C1FC84; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:46:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22741-01-5; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:45:32 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E191FBD4; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:45:32 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DCC1FC11 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:45:30 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22741-01-4 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:44:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr (smtp1-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.27]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840FD1FBD4 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:44:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9F81AB2F8 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:44:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.32] (pas38-3-82-226-102-214.fbx.proxad.net [82.226.102.214]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB821AB2F3 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:44:09 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: <20080313191602.cdd05520.schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:39494 Archived-At: Le Thursday 13 March 2008 19:16:02 Wolfgang Schuster, vous avez =E9crit=A0: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:03:22 -0400 (EDT) > > Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced by the > > > \in command in upshape format (even in an italic paragraph for > > > example). I tried with the 'left' option of \definereferenceformat, b= ut > > > without good results. > > > > > > I would also like to typeset all formulae numbers in upshape. I know > > > Aditya posted about this a long time ago but I can't find the thread > > > any more... > > > > I also could not get things to work with \definereferenceformat. > > This is what I use: > > > > \definereferenceformat [doeqref] [left=3D(,right=3D)] > > \def\eqref[#1]{{\normal \doeqref[#1]}} > > Why not > > \definereferenceformat > [eqref] > [left=3D\normal(, > right=3D)] > > Wolfgang Is it so simple, really? Great! But can't this have some side effects in = particular cases? I mean, the {} around \normal aren't needed here? Well, it seems ok for me in slanted enumerations for theorems and such. Thank you! Morgan ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________