From: Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: References and formulae numbers in upshape
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 20:13:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080313201352.c8819a36.schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200803131944.06455.morgan.brassel@free.fr>
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:44:06 +0100
Morgan Brassel <morgan.brassel@free.fr> wrote:
> Le Thursday 13 March 2008 19:16:02 Wolfgang Schuster, vous avez écrit :
> > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:03:22 -0400 (EDT)
> >
> > Aditya Mahajan <adityam@umich.edu> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Morgan Brassel wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I'm looking for an easy way to typeset all references produced by the
> > > > \in command in upshape format (even in an italic paragraph for
> > > > example). I tried with the 'left' option of \definereferenceformat, but
> > > > without good results.
> > > >
> > > > I would also like to typeset all formulae numbers in upshape. I know
> > > > Aditya posted about this a long time ago but I can't find the thread
> > > > any more...
> > >
> > > I also could not get things to work with \definereferenceformat.
> > > This is what I use:
> > >
> > > \definereferenceformat [doeqref] [left=(,right=)]
> > > \def\eqref[#1]{{\normal \doeqref[#1]}}
> >
> > Why not
> >
> > \definereferenceformat
> > [eqref]
> > [left=\normal(,
> > right=)]
> >
> > Wolfgang
>
> Is it so simple, really? Great! But can't this have some side effects in
> particular cases? I mean, the {} around \normal aren't needed here?
Not in this case because references are grouped by themselve but it is
better to use grouping.
\definereferenceformat
[eqref]
[left=\bgroup\normal(,
right=)\egroup]
> Well, it seems ok for me in slanted enumerations for theorems and such.
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-13 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-13 0:39 Morgan Brassel
2008-03-13 12:03 ` Aditya Mahajan
2008-03-13 17:50 ` Morgan Brassel
2008-03-13 20:00 ` Aditya Mahajan
2008-03-13 18:16 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2008-03-13 18:44 ` Morgan Brassel
2008-03-13 19:13 ` Wolfgang Schuster [this message]
2008-03-13 19:59 ` Aditya Mahajan
2008-03-14 2:49 ` Morgan Brassel
2008-03-14 8:00 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2008-03-14 21:30 ` Morgan Brassel
2008-03-15 7:28 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2008-03-15 8:17 ` Jan-Erik Hägglöf
2008-03-15 8:45 ` Johan Sandblom
2008-03-15 9:10 ` Jan-Erik Hägglöf
2008-03-15 14:33 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2008-03-15 15:15 ` Jan-Erik Hägglöf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080313201352.c8819a36.schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com \
--to=schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).