ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* bibl-apa.tex wrong?
@ 2008-05-26 21:52 Matej Barič
  2008-05-27  6:36 ` Taco Hoekwater
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matej Barič @ 2008-05-26 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context

Hello,
This (http://www.liu.edu/cwis/cwp/library/workshop/citapa.htm) and  
just about any other site I look at specifies publisher info as  
"<city, state>: <publisher name>", whereas bibl-apa.tex specifies it  
as "<publisher name>, <city, state>".
Why is the file called bibl-apa.tex if it doesn't follow APA rules? Am  
I missing something
thanks,
Matej
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: bibl-apa.tex wrong?
@ 2008-05-27 11:44 Matej Barič
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matej Barič @ 2008-05-27 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

> Originally (years ago already), I reverse-engineered apalike from
> latex. It is quite possible I made a error there (or even that
> apalike had it wrong) but if no-one reports a bug it is not noticed.
> Also, I've had quite a few incorrect bug reports about the styles, so
> I am no longer all that eager to change them at a single bug report.
> Two questions: do you have a definitive source somewhere? and are
> there any other problems you see in bibl-apa.tex
I see... well I'd be glad to go through whole APA style recommendation  
and test bibl-apa.tex, but I'm no expert and currently I am really  
busy for a few next weeks.
I don't have a definitive source, but just about any source I have  
seen (including Wikipedia and my faculty rules) says bibl-apa.tex is  
wrong in that case.
As I've started using ConTeXT just a few days ago I couldn't have seen  
any other problems so far but I will collect them if I find them and  
do a little more research on them.
So for now don't bother, but sometime in future I will definitely  
contact you again if I have some more things to fix.
Thanks,
matej
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-12  8:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-26 21:52 bibl-apa.tex wrong? Matej Barič
2008-05-27  6:36 ` Taco Hoekwater
2008-05-27 14:05   ` Tobias Burnus
2008-05-27 15:16   ` David
2008-05-27 17:36   ` David
2008-05-28  8:14     ` Taco Hoekwater
2008-06-12  8:51       ` Taco Hoekwater
2008-05-27 11:44 Matej Barič

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).