Re: MkII vs. MkIV

[Marcin Borkowski <mbork@atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl>]

Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:02:13PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster napisał(a):
> 
> Am 04.11.2008 um 22:51 schrieb Marcin Borkowski:
> 
> > Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:06:13PM +0100, Arthur Reutenauer  
> > napisał(a):
> >>> Thank you for your prompt answers.  I am a bit surprised, though,  
> >>> that
> >>> the otf and Type1 Latin Modern fonts are not compatible.  Strange  
> >>> thing.
> >>
> >>  You should come to BachoTeX.  In 2007 Jerzy Ludwichowski and  
> >> Bogusław
> >> Jackowski started their talk about TeX Gyre by screaming "Full
> >> compatibility means no progress!" at the audience :-)
> >
> > I know that, I read some of the GUST people papers;).  I thought,
> > however, that it wouldn't influence my documents *so much*;).
> 
> LuaTeX did not always behave like pdfTeX and if you want the same result
> in your document as in the past, don't switch. The different code for  
> MkII and
> MkIV are another reason for different output in a few cases.

Well, since I'm really a beginner, I don't have much ConTeXt documents.
So I guess the sooner I switch, the better - especially that MkIV is
better for my itemizations;).

> 
> Wolfgang
> 
Greets

-- 
Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl)

888 * Nie lękaj się * Ja zawsze będę z Tobą!
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________