From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/45290 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: MkII vs. MkIV Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:18:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20081104221857.GI2264@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> References: <20081104200615.GA2264@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> <420A16D6-319B-49F6-8B52-F7E7FDF5618B@gmail.com> <20081104205922.GC2264@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> <20081104210613.GA8045@phare.normalesup.org> <20081104215109.GH2264@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> <7EA5ECB0-B12D-4F73-85A9-84913211AB5E@gmail.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225837368 32455 80.91.229.12 (4 Nov 2008 22:22:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 22:22:48 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Tue Nov 04 23:23:49 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KxUJI-0001eA-IV for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:23:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAD11FB7F; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:22:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04952-01-2; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:21:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EADF1FC06; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:21:11 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43FF1FC06 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:21:08 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04135-04-3 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:20:15 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl (atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl [150.254.78.2]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8861FB98 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:18:58 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B461438F08 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:18:58 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (PLD-Linux) at wmid.amu.edu.pl Original-Received: from atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id BlwCqNzX03ZS for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:18:57 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl (Postfix, from userid 3884) id BE6B614D382F; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 23:18:57 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7EA5ECB0-B12D-4F73-85A9-84913211AB5E@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:45290 Archived-At: Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 11:02:13PM +0100, Wolfgang Schuster napisał(= a): > = > Am 04.11.2008 um 22:51 schrieb Marcin Borkowski: > = > > Dnia Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 10:06:13PM +0100, Arthur Reutenauer = > > napisał(a): > >>> Thank you for your prompt answers. I am a bit surprised, though, = > >>> that > >>> the otf and Type1 Latin Modern fonts are not compatible. Strange = > >>> thing. > >> > >> You should come to BachoTeX. In 2007 Jerzy Ludwichowski and = > >> Bogus=B3aw > >> Jackowski started their talk about TeX Gyre by screaming "Full > >> compatibility means no progress!" at the audience :-) > > > > I know that, I read some of the GUST people papers;). I thought, > > however, that it wouldn't influence my documents *so much*;). > = > LuaTeX did not always behave like pdfTeX and if you want the same result > in your document as in the past, don't switch. The different code for = > MkII and > MkIV are another reason for different output in a few cases. Well, since I'm really a beginner, I don't have much ConTeXt documents. So I guess the sooner I switch, the better - especially that MkIV is better for my itemizations;). > = > Wolfgang > = Greets -- = Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl) 888 * Nie l=EAkaj si=EA * Ja zawsze b=EAd=EA z Tob=B1! ___________________________________________________________________________= ________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to t= he Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-cont= ext webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________= ________