From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/45906 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: bug in mkii xetex: mp figure is not in the right position Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:22:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20081126112249.GD22697@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> References: <68bfdc900811260104i48ce1678uf0a48249e09cad05@mail.gmail.com> <8CB1DC07DD88902-17F4-202D@WEBMAIL-DY11.sysops.aol.com> <20081126095428.GC22697@atos.labs.wmid.amu.edu.pl> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1227698702 16710 80.91.229.12 (26 Nov 2008 11:25:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 11:25:02 +0000 (UTC) To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Wed Nov 26 12:26:05 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L5IWj-0002Kl-Ms for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:25:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229291FC27; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:24:38 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 18945-02-3; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:23:33 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6863C1FC20; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:23:33 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214AE1FBB9 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:23:31 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15157-02-12 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:22:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl (atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl [150.254.78.2]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355E21FC54 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:22:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4FE1020DEB for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:22:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (PLD-Linux) at wmid.amu.edu.pl Original-Received: from atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id RXgK7M2bfVxt for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:22:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl (Postfix, from userid 3884) id B7F221013E09; Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:22:49 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:45906 Archived-At: Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:09:08AM +0100, luigi scarso napisał(a): > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Marcin Borkowski < > mbork@atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl> wrote: > > > Dnia Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:38:59AM +0100, luigi scarso napisał(a): > > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, wrote: > > > > > > > ConTeXt peaple always have used to say that ConTeXt is better than > > LaTeX. > > > > > > yes, true. > > > > Not entirely (see below). > > > please, note: > not **all** context peaple (whatever peaple means!) > have used to say that ConTeXt is better than LaTeX, > but **some** context peaple (I, for example, assuming peaple == people ) > You are a counter example . > So the statement is ** entirely true **. ok, I give up;) > > > > > > > Also > > > LaTeX peaple always have used to say that LaTeX is better than ConTeXt > > > is true > > > > > > yes, as before > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been recieving emails from CoNTeXt list and it seems that > > ConTeXt > > > > has heaps of bugs. > > > > > > > > > > There are some bugs. > > > > As in most software projects. And, that;s true, there _are_ lots of > > bugs in ConTeXt. But still, it is very usable. > > > "lots of bug" and "still very usable" > are contradictory statemens . No. Most popular case: M$ Windows (although personally I'll argue about their "usability";)). The point is that ConTeXt bugs do not crash it in usual scenarios, but rather when some complex interactions are involved. So usually everything is fine, _unless_ you want something strange. And then - well, _strange_ things do happen. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > LaTeX rocks...! > > > > > > true, if you are from LaTeX peaple. > > > > see before . > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl) > > > > Emacs: Escape-Meta-Alt-Control-Shift. > > > true . ** entirely true **. Glad you like it. (Personally, I use both emacs and vim. Really.) BTW: do you know what "vim" means? It is an old African word meaning "how do you quit this f#####g s##t?" Greets -- Marcin Borkowski (http://mbork.pl) People can be divided into three groups: those who can count and those who can't. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________