From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/47078 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan BRASLAU Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: combination Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:08:50 +0100 Organization: CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC Message-ID: <200901290908.50534.alan.braslau@cea.fr> References: <30EBCB40-A1EB-4BC4-953B-5CDE8ADBEA37@cea.fr> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233218559 9870 80.91.229.12 (29 Jan 2009 08:42:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:42:39 +0000 (UTC) To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu Jan 29 09:43:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LSSV3-0005Vw-Q9 for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:43:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4416E1FCAF; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:41:53 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07844-01; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:40:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6720C1FC6F; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:40:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472811FC71 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:38:29 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06492-01 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:36:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from filter4-nij.mf.surf.net (filter4-nij.mf.surf.net [195.169.124.155]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE82C1FC84 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:08:59 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.1]) by filter4-nij.mf.surf.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n0T88v0O025663 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:08:58 +0100 Original-Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302A594010B; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:08:54 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from drec-hb-001817.localnet (cev75-1-81-57-248-225.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.248.225]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C41940106; Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:08:52 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.26; KDE/4.2.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <30EBCB40-A1EB-4BC4-953B-5CDE8ADBEA37@cea.fr> Content-Disposition: inline X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=212.27.42.1; country=FR; latitude=46.0000; longitude=2.0000; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=46.0000,2.0000&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 172058472 - b492a57d1779 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 195.169.124.155 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:47078 Archived-At: I think in this case you might be better off placing the figures in a table. I was thinking about posting a question about the nesting of combinations, say to arrange a row of two figures next to a stack of three figures, for example. This currently does not appear to work... Maybe other ConTeXt users might have some ideas? Alan On Wednesday 28 January 2009 15:14:58 Nicolas Luchier wrote: > Hello, > > I searched the mailing archive but found nothing about my problem. > > I have 3 figures to put into combination 2*2. The way it is handle it > that the third figure is place below the first one, which is quite > logical. I'd rather have it centered in the second row. Is there any > mean to do this ? I didn't find a clue anywhere. > > Thank you. > > Nicolas ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________