Re: MKIV, fonts, confusion

[Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny@eglug.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1257 bytes --]

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:03:10AM +0200, luigi scarso wrote:
> $>pdffonts felltype.pdf
> name                          
>        type              emb sub uni object ID
> ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- --- ---------
> PDPWHW+LMRoman12-Regular             CID Type 0C       yes yes yes      4  0
> DUTOMC+IM_FELL_Double_Pica_PRO_Roman CID Type 0C       yes yes yes      5  0
> 
> $>pdffonts felltype_oo.pdf
> name                                 type              emb sub uni object ID
> ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- --- ---------
> FTLUYL+IM_FELL_Double_Pica_PRO_Roman Type 1C           yes yes no       8  0
> FTLUYL+IM_FELL_Double_Pica_PRO_Roman Type 1C
> 
> So I don't understand how OO "transform" this opentype in a Type1 ,
> and if is it possible to do  the same thing in mkiv.

Not only OOo, InDesign does that too, moreover, someone said even if
LuaTeX (XeTeX too) output looked OK in Adobe reader 7, the print isn't
OK.


-- 
 Khaled Hosny
 Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team
 Free font developer

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 487 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________