From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/50486 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Arthur Reutenauer Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: MKIV, fonts, confusion Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20090514121011.GA26986@phare.normalesup.org> References: <5df5befa0905130618j570c02a5k687b3aea95fa89c0@mail.gmail.com> <2558D296-F58B-4CF8-80AF-262F9412EA5F@gmail.com> <67385EE9-3CC2-4900-B3AA-5D693744D8F0@gmail.com> <20090514114943.GA5835@khaled-laptop> Reply-To: Mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1242303053 8901 80.91.229.12 (14 May 2009 12:10:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 12:10:53 +0000 (UTC) To: Mailing list for ConTeXt users Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Thu May 14 14:10:45 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M4Zlr-0000Ik-2S for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8871FF91; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:41 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19476-03; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:23 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1D61FE8E; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:22 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9684C1FE8E for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20035-03 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from filter1-ams.mf.surf.net (filter1-ams.mf.surf.net [192.87.102.69]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2041FDFF for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:13 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from nef2.ens.fr (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.40]) by filter1-ams.mf.surf.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5) with ESMTP id n4ECAChP024025 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:12 +0200 Original-Received: from phare.normalesup.org (phare.normalesup.org [129.199.129.80]) by nef2.ens.fr (8.13.6/1.01.28121999) with ESMTP id n4ECABDk086148 for ; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Envelope-To: Original-Received: by phare.normalesup.org (Postfix, from userid 1008) id 93E27BC0BE; Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:11 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090514114943.GA5835@khaled-laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.1.4 (nef2.ens.fr [129.199.96.32]); Thu, 14 May 2009 14:10:11 +0200 (CEST) X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: @@RPTN) X-CanIt-Geo: ip=129.199.96.40; country=FR; region=A8; city=Paris; latitude=48.8667; longitude=2.3333; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=48.8667,2.3333&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: uu:ntg-context@ntg.nl (inherits from uu:default, base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 225472161 - 1f875d7eb5f9 - 20090514 X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.87.102.69 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:50486 Archived-At: > Not only OOo, InDesign does that too, moreover, someone said even if > LuaTeX (XeTeX too) output looked OK in Adobe reader 7, the print isn't > OK. On what printer? It's probably a bug in the driver, too. LuaTeX does exactly according to specification, I discussed this strategy with Taco years ago. I suppose XeTeX does conform, too, and it came to that arrangement independently. It's really sad that Adobe does not conform to its own specifications. Arthur ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________