Which Mk is in TexLive?

Which Mk is in TexLive?

[Matija Šuklje]

Hullo,

I wonder whether MkII or MkIV is included in TexLive 2009 (and which one in 
2008)...


Cheers,
Matija
-- 
gsm: +386 41 849 552
www: http://matija.suklje.name
xmpp: matija.suklje@gabbler.org
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Which Mk is in TexLive?

[Mojca Miklavec]

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 22:36, Matija Šuklje wrote:
> Hullo,
>
> I wonder whether MkII or MkIV is included in TexLive 2009 (and which one in
> 2008)...

Both are included in 2009, but MKIV is de-facto non-functional. (It's
incompatible with LuaTeX in 2009 and even if present so old that it's
useless in 2008.)

But if you would like to make it work in TeX Live 2009 ... I have some
99%-working code on my TODO list since the meeting in Bohinj.

Exclusive offer for you:
"You can invite me for a beer at BachoTeX" in exchange for finishing
and publishing it.

Mojca
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Which Mk is in TexLive?

[Matija Šuklje]

Dne četrtek 18. marca 2010 ob 23:51:10 je Mojca Miklavec napisal(a):
> > I wonder whether MkII or MkIV is included in TexLive 2009 (and which one
> > in 2008)...
> 
> Both are included in 2009, but MKIV is de-facto non-functional. (It's
> incompatible with LuaTeX in 2009 and even if present so old that it's
> useless in 2008.)

OK, thank you.

> But if you would like to make it work in TeX Live 2009 ... I have some
> 99%-working code on my TODO list since the meeting in Bohinj.
> 
> Exclusive offer for you:
> "You can invite me for a beer at BachoTeX" in exchange for finishing
> and publishing it.

Hmmmm, since I most probably won't be attending the BachoTeX, that'd be hard 
to fulfil, but I could offer you a beer in Ljubljana ;)


Cheers,
Matija
-- 
gsm: +386 41 849 552
www: http://matija.suklje.name
xmpp: matija.suklje@gabbler.org
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: Which Mk is in TexLive?

[luigi scarso]

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Matija Šuklje <matija@suklje.name> wrote:
> Hmmmm, since I most probably won't be attending the BachoTeX, that'd be hard
> to fulfil, but I could offer you a beer in Ljubljana ;)

beer for free in Ljubljana  ??
be careful...
-- 
luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________