Hello again,


On 2010-05-04 <23:36:17>, Michael Saunders wrote:
> III.  Philipp Gesang's lua-based solution connects headwords to
> entries just as \definesynonyms[gentry][gentries][\infull][\inshort]
> does, and it produces something that looks like a glossary, but the
> entries have no link back to the text.  Also, I don't see the point of
> the \usegloss{word} command unless it references the substantive
> discussion(s) of the word.  I think that is what his
> "\usegloss[exp]{word}" is for, but then there should be a reference to
> it in the entry.  Something like:
> {\bd headword}---entry text, p.\at[g:headword]
Here you are! Now the link back to the main explanation (yes, that's
what \usegloss[#1]#2 with a nonempty first argument does) is carried by
a page reference at the end of the entry. Let me know if you want me to
change the formatting.

> There probably is some advantage in using the lua script for this, but
> I don't know what it is.
No advantage other than time saving …
 
> About tooltips:
> \tooltip surprised me, and I was impressed that it appears to typeset
> the tooltip text with Context, but there are some problems with it:
> 
> 1. It's stretched horizontally.
> 2. The active area begins at the baseline and stretches about 1 ex
> _under_ the word.
> 3. It appears without a border and under the cursor.
> 
> I have seen tooltips in pdf files before, and they looked better than
> this.  I suspect the reason is that, as you say, \tooltip uses
> Javascript, and the ones I saw use a different mechanism.  I dug
> around and found this reference which describes how it's done with
> form fields and invisible buttons:
> http://gilbertconsulting.com/pdf/Build_tool_tips_in_InDesign.pdf
I had a look at that, he is creating pdf forms and uses them as tooltips
-- consequentially I couldn't even see them in xpdf.

> (Notice how tidy the tooltips in it look.) That document describes
> setting them up manually in a point-and-click interface, but surely
> Context could automate this by putting an invisible frame around the
> word and creating a form field/button over it?
> And, correct me if I'm wrong, but that mechanism is not
> Javascript-based at all, is it?
Well, it is form-(“widget”-)based and at least some forms use js. The
omniscient landfill has some info about this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pdf#Interactive_elements
But with those elements not even working I have no way to tell them
apart. You might be interested in a thread on c.t.t. where widgets and
the phantom-box approach are used to accomplish the same in latex:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.text.tex/browse_thread/thread/863613f3d13337f1/989369a06aaf7a34?lnk=raot

> (by the way:  I've not broken the thread again, have I?)
Unfortunately, yes, gmail is again misbehaving.


Phg

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments