From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/59156 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Krauss Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: 64-bit kfreebsd Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 10:53:55 +0200 Message-ID: <20100530084825.2E707C9BB3@balder.ntg.nl> References: <201005290803.o4T83ZGu009056@oxalide.extra.cea.fr> <201005291411.44501.alan.braslau@cea.fr> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275209314 6561 80.91.229.12 (30 May 2010 08:48:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 May 2010 08:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users , Mojca Miklavec To: Alan BRASLAU Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun May 30 10:48:33 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([195.12.62.10]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OIeC8-0000kg-Ur for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 May 2010 10:48:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934E8C9BB3; Sun, 30 May 2010 10:48:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id PzfhFzbxr0zt; Sun, 30 May 2010 10:48:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39ACC9C40; Sun, 30 May 2010 10:48:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7E1C9C40 for ; Sun, 30 May 2010 10:48:27 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at balder.ntg.nl Original-Received: from balder.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (balder.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id aWnU7rr9DTHz for ; Sun, 30 May 2010 10:48:25 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by balder.ntg.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E707C9BB3 for ; Sun, 30 May 2010 10:48:25 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 30 May 2010 08:48:24 -0000 Original-Received: from reverse-82-141-58-227.dialin.kamp-dsl.de (EHLO gandalf.gondor) [82.141.58.227] by mail.gmx.net (mp022) with SMTP; 30 May 2010 10:48:24 +0200 X-Authenticated: #22422591 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+p+Z1KF+SpsYhsjy7+g/n6Glb2U34w0NOMNJ088l kve+cuuZMO4fVb In-Reply-To: <201005291411.44501.alan.braslau@cea.fr> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.5 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:59156 Archived-At: On Sat, 29 May 2010 14:11:44 +0200 Alan BRASLAU wrote: > uname -s uname -m uname -p > ---------------------------------------- > Intel Q9400 (Core2 Quad): > FreeBSD amd64 amd64 > GNU/kFreeBSD x86_64 amd64 > Linux x86_64 unknown > 32bit os (same processor): > FreeBSD ? (untested) ? > GNU/kFreeBSD i686 i386 > GNU/Linux i686 unknown > ---------------------------------------- > Intel pentium 4: > FreeBSD ? (untested) ? > GNU/kFreeBSD i686 i386 > GNU/Linux i686 unknown > ---------------------------------------- I have collected data from two different machines with a FreeBSD 8.0 i386 LiveCD: uname -s uname -m uname -p ---------------------------------------- Intel E6300 (Core2 Duo): FreeBSD amd64 amd64 32bit os (same processor): FreeBSD i386 i386 ---------------------------------------- Intel Pentium M: FreeBSD i386 i386 > The official 64bit OS name is "amd64" for FreeBSD, GNU/kFreeBSD and > Linux. However, uname -m gives differing results and depends on the > version of the running OS, not the real underlying processor; A 64bit > processor can run a 32bit OS. So both (uname -m and uname -p) don't depend on the installed CPU just on the version of FreeBSD. Probably the implementation of uname(3) is different in FreeBSD libc und GNU libc. Unix is such a homogeneous environment, isn't it ;-) Kind regards, Michael Krauss ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________