Re: Removing Introduction section number

[Alan BRASLAU <alan.braslau@cea.fr>]

On Monday 14 June 2010 13:17:54 Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> 
> Alan BRASLAU wrote:
> > I have to say that I am now a bit confused about the use of arguments in
> > ConTeXt.
> 
> The general rule is quite straightforward:
> 
> * arguments in {} pairs are typeset material
> * arguments in [] are setup instructions and metadata
> 
> Whether or not an argument is optional has nothing to
> do with the used delimiters.

Quite logical and straightforward.

It is useful to read the manual (section 1.3):
"A command is often followed by setups or by text. Setups
are placed between brackets ([]). The scope or range of
the command, the text acted upon, is placed between
curly brackets ({})."

...

I see that my reflexes have been spoiled by years of practice with LaTeX - old 
habits die hard.
Lamport (section 2.5):
"Command arguments are enclosed in curly braces { and },
except for optional arguments, which are enclosed in square
brackets [ and ]."

So I added a paragraph to
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/From_LaTeX_to_ConTeXt#Command_syntax

Alan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________