Dne petek 8. oktobra 2010 ob 20:36:35 je Taco Hoekwater napisal(a):
>   * because it is not free software according to the Debian guidelines;
>   * because it is a binary update;

At a first (and second) glance, I don't feel exactly comfortable with these 
two. Would you care to explain them a bit more?

Does "not free according to Debian" mean that it *is* free according to FSF 
and/or OSI?

Binary updates as in closed source or as in e.g. pictures?


Cheers,
Matija
-- 
gsm:	+386 41 849 552
www:	http://matija.suklje.name
xmpp:	matija.suklje@gabbler.org