Dne petek 29. oktobra 2010 ob 00:42:20 je Hans Hagen napisal(a):
> On 29-10-2010 12:17, Matija Šuklje wrote:
> > Hullo,
> > 
> > from what I can understand I'm using \footnote correctly (i.e. as on
> > wiki), but if I generate the document with 'context' every footnote
> > instance is just a direct copy of the first footnote.
> > 
> > If I generate it with 'texexec' though, the footnotes are generated as
> > expected.
> > 
> > Is that a MkIV bug, feature or just me being stupid?
> 
> sounds like a but or maybe a side effect of how you use the footnote; in
> mkiv footnotes are stored differently (and can actually be accessed in
> many ways) .. so a small test file is needed that shows the problem

\starttext

Something something\footnote{dark side}

Something something\footnote{complete}

\stoptext

Something as simple as that already triggers it in my case.

I'm using minimals from 2010.06.18 11:26.


Cheers,
Matija

-- 
gsm:	+386 41 849 552
www:	http://matija.suklje.name
xmpp:	matija.suklje@gabbler.org