Re: Module Namespaces

[Philipp Gesang <pgesang@ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 764 bytes --]

Dear Hans,

On 2010-12-06 <17:50:15>, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 29-11-2010 7:52, Philipp Gesang wrote:
> 
> >If I may add to this question: I am using “job.variables” as kind
> >of base for my private use area (not for modules, though) -- bad
> >habit or valid alternative?
> 
> bad habit .. use documentdata.pg or so

you once[1] recommended “job.variables.tobesaved” for situations
where something has to be stored for successive runs.

Is the “more robus user space” for this that you mentioned
already implemented?

Regards, Philipp


[1] http://archive.contextgarden.net/message/20100427.214703.0d3775c4.en.html

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________