From: Philipp Gesang <pgesang@ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Does MKIV take more time as MKII
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 18:54:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110314175404.GA4701@orcus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=rD+wfYnLdb8=vTCHqpwGdsvUPy8cs_byEAkmO@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1124 bytes --]
On 2011-03-14 <11:23:55>, Cecil Westerhof wrote:
> I installed the minimals and use MKIV. It seems that it is 1,5 to 2 times as
> slow as the MKII I used in texlive. Is this possible, or should there be
> something else that is responsible for this?
Hi Cecil,
regarding luatex/mkiv performance there are some comparisons
between different tex machines that Hans presented at tug 2009:
<http://river-valley.tv/the-luatex-project-halfway-to-version-1/>
Of course, with respect to the rapid development these might be
out of date by now.
Best regards, Philipp
> --
> Cecil Westerhof
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-14 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-14 10:23 Cecil Westerhof
2011-03-14 11:44 ` Wolfgang Schuster
2011-03-14 11:48 ` Cecil Westerhof
2011-03-14 13:02 ` Aditya Mahajan
2011-03-14 13:34 ` Alan BRASLAU
2011-03-14 13:47 ` Cecil Westerhof
2011-03-14 19:52 ` Mojca Miklavec
2011-03-14 20:22 ` John Haltiwanger
2011-03-15 7:56 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2011-03-16 16:39 ` Hans Hagen
2011-03-16 16:52 ` luigi scarso
2011-03-16 16:59 ` Hans Hagen
2011-03-14 17:54 ` Philipp Gesang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110314175404.GA4701@orcus \
--to=pgesang@ix.urz.uni-heidelberg.de \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).