From: Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny@eglug.org>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Scaling of math glyphs
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:24:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120128182419.GA5927@khaled-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.02.1201281308070.16928@ybpnyubfg.ybpnyqbznva>
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 01:16:18PM -0500, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my opinion, the size of the \sum in Cambria in display style is
> too large. I know that this is a design decision on part of Cambria
> designers, but I am wondering if I can scale the glyph down.
>
> I made a local copy of cambria-math.lfg and changed
> FixDisplayOperatorMinHeight to
>
> local function FixDisplayOperatorMinHeight(value,target,original)
> table.print(target)
> local o = original.mathparameters.DisplayOperatorMinHeight
> if o < 2240 then
> return 2240.0 * target.parameters.factor
> else
> return 0.8 * value -- already scaled
> end
> end
>
> This works, but as expected, it scales down both \sum and \int. Is
> it possible to just change the height of \sum?
AFAIK, no, this parameter affects all display big operators, however you
can control it from TeX end using ‘\Umathoperatorsize’ primitive, so may
be you can use some TeX grouping hackary to limit its effect.
Regards,
Khaled
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-28 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-28 18:16 Aditya Mahajan
2012-01-28 18:24 ` Khaled Hosny [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120128182419.GA5927@khaled-laptop \
--to=khaledhosny@eglug.org \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).