Suggestion for formula numbering

Suggestion for formula numbering

[Zenlima]

Hi,

as of actual need I summed up all kinds of formula numbering - some
basics are working. You can find this list on my user talk page:

	http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User_talk:Zenlima

As I also found a note in str-math.mkiv that it needs to be rewritten
and the example syntax which leaded me to confusion in the past, I
worked out a suggestion for a more intuitive syntax for formula
numbering.

In sum it ends with:

All three commands: 
	\NR 
	\placeformula 
	\formualanumber 
will share the same attributes: 
 	* sublevel (maybe better: formulalevel or just level?)
	  to define and concrete the (sub-)level of the formula 
 	* listlabel (maybe textlabel? the numberlabel is still needed)
 	  to add a entry in the list of formulas 
 	* reference
	  just a classic reference in order to link to it 
so that the syntax is more intuitive during the writing. 

Also. this way the commands: 
	placesubformula 
 	placenamedformula 
 	placenamedsubformula 
 	startstopsubformulas 
 	subformulanumber 
will become needless.

For the "why" and examples please look at:

http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User_talk:Zenlima#Suggestion_for_new_syntax

I hope you will find parts you like and feel free to add your
opinion. :-)

H.
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________