ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Vertical alignment in combinations?
@ 2013-02-15 21:18 Mari Voipio
  2013-02-16 11:24 ` Marco Patzer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mari Voipio @ 2013-02-15 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mailing list for ConTeXt users

Today I feel like a total ConTeXt dummy...

The problem: I have 3*1 combination where the end graphics are the
same size, but the middle graphic is much shorter. With a standard
\startcombination\stopcombination I can easily get all three
side-by-side, but they are bottom-aligned while I'd need them
middle-aligned. I thought I once had a solution to this, but can't
find it - and, for once, the garden doesn't seem to be able to help.

Is there a setting I can use to fix the vertical alignment? Or should
I give up with combinations and go for a natural table instead? Or do
something totally else?


Thanks,

Mari
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Vertical alignment in combinations?
  2013-02-15 21:18 Vertical alignment in combinations? Mari Voipio
@ 2013-02-16 11:24 ` Marco Patzer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marco Patzer @ 2013-02-16 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ntg-context


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 966 bytes --]

On 2013–02–15 Mari Voipio wrote:

> Today I feel like a total ConTeXt dummy...

As long as it's only today you're much better off than me ;)

> The problem: I have 3*1 combination where the end graphics are the
> same size, but the middle graphic is much shorter. With a standard
> \startcombination\stopcombination I can easily get all three
> side-by-side, but they are bottom-aligned while I'd need them
> middle-aligned.

How about this:

\useMPlibrary [dum]
\setupcombinations [location=middle]
\starttext

\startcombination[3*1]
  \startcontent \externalfigure                \stopcontent
  \startcaption Foo                            \stopcaption
  \startcontent \externalfigure[.][height=2cm] \stopcontent
  \startcaption Bar                            \stopcaption
  \startcontent \externalfigure                \stopcontent
  \startcaption FooBar                         \stopcaption
\stopcombination

\stoptext


Marco

[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 485 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-16 11:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-15 21:18 Vertical alignment in combinations? Mari Voipio
2013-02-16 11:24 ` Marco Patzer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).