ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan BRASLAU <alan.braslau@cea.fr>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Cc: pragma@wxs.nl
Subject: Re: footnotes on wrong page
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 10:46:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130724104650.566bce7a@iram-hb-003386.extra.cea.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51EEE692.5040600@wxs.nl>

On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:24:50 +0200
Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> wrote:

> you use the wrong command and there is also the scope parameter
> 
> \setupnotes[footnote][split=verystrict,scope=page]

Can you clarify this? The syntax is confusing, probably because it has
evolved.

Currently, I use:
	\setupnotation [footnote] [way=bypage,numberconversion=set 2]
for example, but maybe this is no longer the recommended syntax?

Also, in order to restore gobbled space following,%
\startfootnote
\stopfootnote
I use the following setup:
	\setupnote [footnote] [next={ }]
So \setupnotation, \setupnote, \setupnotes is confusing.

Of course, there is
	strc-not.mkvi:\let\setupnotes\setupnote
so \setupnotes is just a synonym for \setupnote.
And then there is also:
	strc-not.mkvi:\let\setupnotations\setupnotation

From what I understand, footnotes can be handled using different
mechanisms, and this is why it gets confusing for users.

Alan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________


  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-24  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-23 19:22 Alan Bowen
2013-07-23 20:24 ` Hans Hagen
2013-07-24  8:46   ` Alan BRASLAU [this message]
2013-07-24  9:57     ` Marco Patzer
2013-07-24 10:23       ` Schmitz Thomas A.
2013-07-24 11:34         ` Alan Bowen
2013-07-24 11:43           ` Hans Hagen
2013-07-24 11:48         ` Hans Hagen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-05  6:02 Footnotes " jeffdod
2006-06-05 15:35 ` Hans Hagen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130724104650.566bce7a@iram-hb-003386.extra.cea.fr \
    --to=alan.braslau@cea.fr \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    --cc=pragma@wxs.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).