ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>
To: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: git or svn
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:26:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130927152625.12c967ca@aga-netbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524583AC.8070505@sil.org>

Dnia 2013-09-27, o godz. 09:10:04
Lars Huttar <lars_huttar@sil.org> napisał(a):

> On 9/26/2013 9:10 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
> > Github seems to be the most popular DVCS hosting site at the moment.
> > For manuals, I think that Github is particularly useful because you
> > can click on edit and make the change. Github automatically creates
> > a fork, a new branch, and pull request for you. So the technical
> > barrier to participation is low.
> 
> I would question the perception that the technical barrier to
> participation on Github is low. Not long ago I tried to submit a patch
> to a project on Github, improving documentation and adding features.
> It took several hours (distributed over a couple of weeks) to learn
> how to do all that was required. It was *not* automatic. It strongly
> discouraged me from making more contributions to that project.
> 
> Maybe some major things have changed on Github since then. In any
> case, I have no doubt that once you know the system, and have the
> infrastructure set up, it's easy to participate. And I'm not saying
> that SVN makes it easy for non-SVN users to participate. All I'm
> saying is that for non-Git users, the technical barrier to
> participation was substantial, last time I tried it.
> 
> Again, I'm not arguing against a move to Git. I would just like to
> contribute my recent experience toward a well-informed decision
> process.

Just my 3 cents.

I am not a heavy Git user (though I am quite accustomed to Mercurial
instead), and I agree that the entry point for Git is not very low.
However, it seems that nowadays, for a *new* user, learning to use SVN
is pointless (unless he joins a project where SVN is used etc.):
distributed VCSs seem to be just much better (and I heard that SVN has
its own problems, too).  So I would perceive this question as touching
a demography issue: younger people are more likely to know/use Git (and
not know SVN), older folk might know/use SVN.

Also, if this matters, Git has an excellent Emacs front-end, Magit.  I
don't know whether SVN has something similar.

> Lars

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Adam Mickiewicz University
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-27 13:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-18 19:53 ConTeXt Manual Errata Thangalin
2013-09-21 17:15 ` Marco Patzer
2013-09-26 17:44   ` Marco Patzer
2013-09-26 20:07     ` Thangalin
2013-09-26 20:15       ` Aditya Mahajan
2013-09-26 20:31         ` Marco Patzer
2013-09-26 20:42         ` Peter Münster
2013-09-26 21:22           ` Mica Semrick
2013-09-26 21:50             ` git or svn (was: ConTeXt Manual Errata) Peter Münster
2013-09-26 21:56               ` Mica Semrick
2013-09-26 23:24                 ` Thangalin
2013-09-27  6:46                 ` git or svn Peter Münster
2013-09-27  1:10               ` git or svn (was: ConTeXt Manual Errata) Aditya Mahajan
2013-09-27  7:01                 ` git or svn Peter Münster
2013-09-27  7:38                   ` Taco Hoekwater
2013-09-27 13:01                     ` Lars Huttar
2013-09-27 13:10                 ` Lars Huttar
2013-09-27 13:26                   ` Marcin Borkowski [this message]
2013-09-27 14:02                     ` Peter Münster
2013-09-27 14:27                     ` Hans Hagen
2013-09-27 17:08                       ` Mica Semrick
2013-09-26 23:22             ` ConTeXt Manual Errata Thangalin
2013-09-27  9:10           ` Marco Patzer
2013-09-27  9:27             ` Peter Münster
2013-09-26 20:17       ` Marco Patzer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130927152625.12c967ca@aga-netbook \
    --to=mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).