From: Alan Braslau <alan.braslau@cea.fr>
To: Rik Kabel <context@rik.users.panix.com>
Cc: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Bibliography issue, @ELECTRONIC editor
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:31:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170224173129.175fe1ec@zoo.hsd1.co.comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f23ff0d-3d73-05fe-b0f2-4254128d5330@rik.users.panix.com>
On Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:36:28 -0500
Rik Kabel <context@rik.users.panix.com> wrote:
> Although either editor or author should be accepted, only author is
> processed. There is a warning message generated by the publications
> subsystem: unable to create short for 'Edited', needs one of
> [author,editor] but clearly there is an editor. A reasonable
> workaround is to use author instead of editor, but it would be nice
> to have a fix.
Editor is not a standard field for the entry @electronic.
It is defined for @article, @periodical, @book, @inbook, @incollection,
and @proceedings. This follows the bibtex documentation and the
standard tools used for maintaining bib files.
Of course, we could add this, or any other field, but I find no entry
either in the APA Specifications describing this.
Alan
--
Alan Braslau
CEA DSM-IRAMIS-SPEC
CNRS UMR 3680
Orme des Merisiers
91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cedex FRANCE
tel: +33 1 69 08 73 15
fax: +33 1 69 08 87 86
mailto:alan.braslau@cea.fr
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-25 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-24 17:36 Rik Kabel
2017-02-25 0:31 ` Alan Braslau [this message]
2017-02-25 1:45 ` Rik Kabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170224173129.175fe1ec@zoo.hsd1.co.comcast.net \
--to=alan.braslau@cea.fr \
--cc=context@rik.users.panix.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).