ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rudolf Bahr <quasi@quasi.de>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Introducing myself
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 09:36:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200419073647.GA3517@nan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bf6482dd859703086ddd8a9aeee331a89d463da.camel@diepenvan.nl>


On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 05:37:07PM +0200, David van Diepen wrote:
> Dear everybody,
> 
> I don't have a particular question for the moment but I thought it
> would be nice to introduce myself as I have just joined the email list.
> 
> My name is David van Diepen, 49 years old. I am a process engineer. I
> have two children.
> 
> A few months ago my son had to prepare his thesis and that's when I
> thought latex would be applicable. Very many years ago I learned to
> work with latex during my education, so I thought that it wouldn't be
> too hard to help him out with that. At the end of the day it actually
> was hard work to get to grisps again but after 10 days we had prepared
> a very good-looking thesis and that's what counts.
> 
> In the line of my work I regularly have to prepare technical documents.
> So I thought it's perhaps a good idea to start using latex for that
> too. My teamleader has given me some space to do that even though latex
> is completely unsupported at work, so I'm doing all that from home. The
> first document was recieved quite wel actually. 
> 
> As you'll probably understand my collegues have difficulty appreciating
> the value of a properly designed document. Everybody seems to agree to
> a similar and often poor appearance. I am the son of a graphic
> designer, so maybe that's why I do care what the documents I produce
> look like. For instance, I have a couple of nice books with examples of
> typefaces (letterproeven) lying about that I inherited, these are an
> inspiration too. Also I think a well designed document conveys the
> content better. So I'm glad that I am allowed start with this
> development even though the benefits are very abstract still.
> 
> That's when I thought whether it would be a good idea to continue
> investing time in latex, or whether it would be better to go with the
> new developments, that being the luatex/context combination. So I
> thought I should at least give it a try. 
> 
> That try was actually harder than I expected. On hindsight I think it
> could have been easier if I had found the right channels to
> documentation sooner. There is a lot of information on context to be
> found but that includes a lot of information that's already superseded.
> So a couple of times it took me quite some time before I realized there
> was a newer and easier method. Anyway I'm well on my way now with my
> first technical ducument in context. The thing I like most about
> context is that the structure makes good sense. In latex there have
> been so many additions troughout the years that it has become quite
> messy really. In the longer run I think the greater array of
> possibilities is going to pay off for my purposes too.
> 
> So I would like to thank you all for allowing me to use this great
> software. I expect that I may post questions in the future because I am
> planning to try more things. For now it's maybe a good idea if I put
> some contributions in the wiki. As a newby I have struggled at some
> points and maybe some howto's with that perspective can be helpful for
> other newcomers.
> 
> For now, thanks again, yours faithfully, David
> 


Hello David!

Thank you for introducing yourself!
It's indeed so, as you pointed out, a lot of information about ConTeXt
is a bit outdated. But, as every programmer knows, it's hard after finishing
a program to find the time to document it. And ConTeXt is developing quickly.

For the same reason as you I left LaTeX four or five years ago and began
to use ConTeXt. And peu à peu I changed even all my elder LaTeX-programs
to ConTeXt.

If you have trouble to find a solution to a problem ask the list. There
are very friendly and highly experienced people and you certainly will be
astonished how quick you shall get an answer in most cases. But always
send a so called MWE (Minimal Working Example) along with your question. 

Good luck with ConTeXt and give it more than just a try!

Best wishes,

Rudolf
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-19  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-18 15:37 David van Diepen
2020-04-18 18:26 ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2020-04-19  7:36 ` Rudolf Bahr [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200419073647.GA3517@nan \
    --to=quasi@quasi.de \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).