From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 5597 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2023 07:11:25 -0000 Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (5.39.185.202) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 13 Aug 2023 07:11:25 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F704814B4 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 09:11:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GvSOJQYmzKf9 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 09:11:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cgl.ntg.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F914829E3 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 09:08:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA518482449 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 09:08:02 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cgl.ntg.nl Received: from cgl.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cgl.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GVLJjZbsRkUe for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 09:08:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mout02.posteo.de (mout02.posteo.de [185.67.36.66]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by cgl.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BFF448243B for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 09:08:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DBF3240101 for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 09:08:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1691910482; bh=WJLFg70B3186IauVL6DltduTKI7qtQJmGiBag4ZIeNw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Mime-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=jEuHRLZqg287KeXre15r1Rd4jBjVbFtztddhTyxdrH0/0I7zwGxTv94IphxX7howg FbpCp6K5o7ctRHGZbcHSwOwaQVip2iIF+qQY17LUcQycApiwqVCQRLLyQD/KYcpdrz 7ZVVbtiYOjkkm70Uj99M3ayCztjAbGmLYMfXpIdKS1MJu0BaPuqVYV7LuFpew+AXDh eQqaa0RHCJH4EqngLLcj0ubBv4TCJp5oS2aTnr0vhRfahTjQyKx+8A28qm7T74ps8N 8gG2SyDblo6M4Z3cQh9IbOuAMLqCi/xrNsAmieXb3qMHZ++kJ2A3FXKrG/82QWkXP9 DmvDCHb7kOOfA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RNpX14wr8z9rxK for ; Sun, 13 Aug 2023 09:08:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 07:08:00 +0000 From: "Xavier B." To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Message-Id: <20230813090800.4beca3138668b332a3b547b1@posteo.net> In-Reply-To: <4c2f67e2-94cc-d571-3697-9dea5d159975@freedom.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: VWLLUS5W5VSHJBZGKNCYGDMSYDB25LEO X-Message-ID-Hash: VWLLUS5W5VSHJBZGKNCYGDMSYDB25LEO X-MailFrom: somenxavier@posteo.net X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Subject: [NTG-context] Re: Why overbar is so big List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit So, Finally is it a bug in MKIV? It seems you fix some kind of bug in your messages. Is it true? > The output with Luametatex is correct but Luatex creates a raised bar > (and different linebreaking). > > \showglyphs > > \startTEXpage[offset=1ex] > \ruledhbox{$\overline {OA} = \overbar {OA} = 4.2$} > \par > \ruledhbox{$\underline {OA} = \underbar {OA} = 4.2$} > \par > \ruledhbox{$\widetilde {OA} = \widebar {OA} = 4.2$} > \par > \ruledhbox{$\overbracket {OA} = \underbracket {OA} = 4.2$} > \stopTEXpage > > I'll add a 'force fix in spite of extensible being present' in mkiv. In > lmtx we always fix also because we drop in nicer shapes (watch the round > tips in lm and fancy tips in antykwa) and concluded that fonts will > remain as they are. > > Hans As you suggested, I will give a try to LMTX but be aware most user still use MKIV until most distros upgrade the texlive version of context to LMTX. Regards, Xavier ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / https://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : https://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : https://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________