Re: ConTeXt equivalent for \ensuremath?

[Gerben Wierda <Gerben.Wierda@rna.nl>]

On Mar 11, 2005, at 18:20, Adam Lindsay wrote:

> Gerben Wierda said this at Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:54:38 +0100:
>
>> But my way also doesn't work. I get empty output as a result of the
>> \bit{b}{off} command.
>>
>> Help?
>
> This is probably not satisfying, because you probably want to get new
> mathematics commands working, but if this is to be used solely in text,
> you could use (or expand to):
>  b\low{off}
>
> \low (and \hi and \lohi) look like they work robustly in both math and
> text modes.

I'll see. I wonder if it will look the same. Especially in terms of 
font. Do I get the same font in both sides? Do I get the same kerning?

> I'm a bit confused by you using \newcommand in your (ConTeXt?) 
> examples,
> though...

Yes, strange, isn't it? It just works. I copied one accidentally over 
and it worked. So I kept using it.

G