From: Giuseppe Bilotta <gip.bilotta@iol.it>
Subject: In-paragraph display
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 10:06:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <231935513.20021201100653@iol.it> (raw)
Hello,
I'm going to bring the discussion back to a sore point that really
needs to be cleared.
When dealing with displayed material (equations, itemizations,
quotations etc) the following four cases are (or rather should be)
different:
==============================
Case 1:
some text before
\startdisplay
displayed material
\stopdisplay
some text after
==============================
Case 2:
some text before
\startdisplay
displayed material
\stopdisplay
some text after
==============================
Case 3:
some text before
\startdisplay
displayed material
\stopdisplay
some text after
==============================
Case 4:
some text before
\startdisplay
displayed material
\stopdisplay
some text after
==============================
The reason why they should be different is that
(1) in case 1 the display is part of the paragraph which includes
both the text before, the displayed material, and the text after
(2) in case 2 the display is part of a the paragraph which begins
with the displayed material and includes the text after, but not
the text before
(3) in case 3 the display is part of a the paragraph which begins
with the displayed material and includes the text before, but not
the text after
(4) in case 4 the display forms a paragraph on its own
Why is this important? Assume for example that the paragraphs are
set to have an indent (\setupindenting[medium], for example) and
that the indentnext option is set to true. In this case "some text
after" would only be indented in cases (3) and (4), but not in
cases (1) and (2), since in cases (3) and (4) it starts a new
paragraph while in cases (1) and (2) it is part of the previous
paragraph.
Is it just an impression of mine, or is it true that this is not
the case in ConTeXt? The behaviour in all three cases seems to be
the same ...
--
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-01 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-01 9:06 Giuseppe Bilotta [this message]
2002-12-02 14:34 ` Hans Hagen
2002-12-02 17:03 ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-12-02 17:40 ` Hans Hagen
2002-12-03 0:37 ` Re[3]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-12-03 1:18 ` Bruce D'Arcus
2002-12-03 9:25 ` Re[5]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-12-03 10:46 ` Hans Hagen
2002-12-03 11:12 ` Re[6]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-12-03 12:48 ` Hans Hagen
2002-12-03 15:24 ` Re[7]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-12-03 19:47 ` Re[3]: " Simon Pepping
2002-12-03 11:00 ` Hans Hagen
2002-12-03 15:24 ` Re[4]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=231935513.20021201100653@iol.it \
--to=gip.bilotta@iol.it \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).