From: Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users <ntg-context@ntg.nl>
Subject: Re: Color Lost when Using 'texexec' vs 'context'
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 10:03:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24931B2F-EB95-431B-B11C-E0D61E4DDAA6@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A259EE10-02CB-44BA-B901-85C1B44FD73D@stien.de>
Am 17.03.2012 um 09:55 schrieb Malte Stien:
> Hi all,
>
> I am using some darkgray in my documents, as in
>
> \color[darkgray] foo...
>
> which was working out well as long as I was processing my documents with the 'context' command. I recently started using 'texexec' instead, as in
>
> texexec --pdf definitions-acronyms-and-abbreviations.tex
>
> (which, I understand is preferable) and strangely, all of my darkgray text is now rendered black. Any ideas why the command makes a difference and what to do about it?
The is a big different between the “context” and the “texexec” commands, with “context” you use MkIV (LuaTeX) to process your document while “texexec” uses MkII (pdfTeX [default] or XeTeX) to produce the PDF. The reason why you don’t get colors is that they are disabled in MkII and you have to enable them first with \setupcolors[state=start] but for MkIV this has changed and colors are now enabled by default.
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-17 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-17 8:55 Malte Stien
2012-03-17 9:00 ` Mojca Miklavec
2012-03-17 9:03 ` Wolfgang Schuster [this message]
[not found] <mailman.60.1331975009.3819.ntg-context@ntg.nl>
2012-03-18 3:36 ` Malte Stien
2012-03-18 8:09 ` Wolfgang Schuster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24931B2F-EB95-431B-B11C-E0D61E4DDAA6@googlemail.com \
--to=schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com \
--cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).