ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Giuseppe Bilotta <bourbaki@bigfoot.com>
Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re[2]: A proposal for the sectioning commands--addendum
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 23:17:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <271821248.20020621231757@bigfoot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200206211201.27913.john@wexfordpress.com>

Friday, June 21, 2002 John Culleton wrote:

>> Hans, do you think you can implement this easily?
JC> Addendum to my previous comments:

JC> I use folding in GVim by putting a ``stop'' command just before each 
JC> ``start'' commnad. this is clumsy but it is easier to remember than what 
JC> Bilotti proposes. Better would be an editor that did this kind of controlling
JC> automatically. Here is a sample of what I must do currently:

JC> %--1
JC> \chapter{The Best of Breed Software Packages}
JC> %++1
JC> %--2
JC> \section{Operating Systems}
JC> %++2
JC> %--3
JC> \subsection{Linux}
JC> %++3

JC> The above is not elegant but with the proper setup in .vimrc it works.

Since you can put up a Vim folding file that recognizes \start ...
\stop pair (and it would work with ANY \start ... \stop pair), you
can see how it helps. But of course the ability to fold easily is
just one (and the least important) of the pluses that come from
structured sectioning ..

JC> Incidentally I use Context not because it is ``structured'' but because it
JC> implements features not found in other incarnations of TeX, like hanging
JC> punctuation and sidebars.

So do I. But I also want to take advantage as much as possible of
the capabilities offered by the structure.

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta


  reply	other threads:[~2002-06-21 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-06-21 13:46 A proposal for the sectioning commangs Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-06-21 15:27 ` John Culleton
2002-06-21 21:15   ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-06-21 22:37     ` Duncan Hothersall
2002-06-22  2:24       ` John Culleton
2002-06-23 21:47     ` Re[2]: " Hans Hagen
2002-06-23 10:45   ` Hans Hagen
2002-06-21 16:01 ` A proposal for the sectioning commands--addendum John Culleton
2002-06-21 21:17   ` Giuseppe Bilotta [this message]
2002-06-23 19:39   ` Hans Hagen
2002-06-23 21:42     ` Re[2]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-06-24  8:40       ` Hans Hagen
2002-06-24  8:55         ` Re[3]: " Giuseppe Bilotta
2002-06-24 18:06           ` texedit (was: something else) Henning Hraban Ramm
2002-06-25 15:47             ` Hans Hagen
2002-06-26 18:43               ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2002-06-27 16:54                 ` Hans Hagen
2002-06-28 21:48                   ` Henning Hraban Ramm
2002-06-23 10:43 ` A proposal for the sectioning commangs Hans Hagen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=271821248.20020621231757@bigfoot.com \
    --to=bourbaki@bigfoot.com \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).