3SIDE imposition schema weirdness

3SIDE imposition schema weirdness

[Nicolas Girard]

Hi,
i'm a little bit puzzled by the results of the following test file,
using the 3SIDE imposition schema from Willi (
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Imposition#Additional_schemas ).
The results consists in pages 1|2|3 on the recto of the sheet, and
pages 4|5|6 on the verso.

* Is it really the intended result ?
* If so, I don't understand how can \dosetuparrangement{3}{1}{6}{4}{2}
give 1|2|3 // 4|5|6 . What's the rationale ? Why no page 5 among the
arguments of \dosetuparrangement ?
* What if one wants to fold the resulting brochure ? How to adapt the
code (besides by try and error) for the resulting arrangement to be
3|6|1 // 2|4|5 ?

Thanks in advance,
cheers,
Nicolas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness

[Henning Hraban Ramm]

Am 2009-06-10 um 11:47 schrieb Nicolas Girard:

> The results consists in pages 1|2|3 on the recto of the sheet, and
> pages 4|5|6 on the verso.
>
> * Is it really the intended result ?

Yes. This schema is only for paper-saving; as I wrote in the wiki, I  
wanted to print 3 small planner pages on one A4 page.

Sorry, can't help you with the code.

Greetlings from Lake Constance!
Hraban
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
https://www.cacert.org (I'm an assurer)

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness

[Wolfgang Schuster]

http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User:Wolfgang_Schuster#Brochures

Wolfgang

Am 10.06.2009 um 11:47 schrieb Nicolas Girard:

> Hi,
> i'm a little bit puzzled by the results of the following test file,
> using the 3SIDE imposition schema from Willi (
> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Imposition#Additional_schemas ).
> The results consists in pages 1|2|3 on the recto of the sheet, and
> pages 4|5|6 on the verso.
>
> * Is it really the intended result ?
> * If so, I don't understand how can \dosetuparrangement{3}{1}{6}{4}{2}
> give 1|2|3 // 4|5|6 . What's the rationale ? Why no page 5 among the
> arguments of \dosetuparrangement ?
> * What if one wants to fold the resulting brochure ? How to adapt the
> code (besides by try and error) for the resulting arrangement to be
> 3|6|1 // 2|4|5 ?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> cheers,
> Nicolas
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an  
> entry to the Wiki!
>
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness

[Nicolas Girard]

2009/6/10 Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>:
> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User:Wolfgang_Schuster#Brochures
>

Hi Wolfgang,
well, it seems quite interesting ! Would you allow me to put your code
in the Imposition page, or could you consider doing so ?

Nevertheless, I couldn't make your code work ; I get:

    Fatal error: catcode push/pop mismatch. Fix this!

    \wait=

Cheers,
Nicolas
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness

[Wolfgang Schuster]

Am 10.06.2009 um 14:53 schrieb Nicolas Girard:

> Hi Wolfgang,
> well, it seems quite interesting ! Would you allow me to put your code
> in the Imposition page, or could you consider doing so ?

Do as you want.

> Nevertheless, I couldn't make your code work ; I get:

There was a \unprotect missing at the start of the code, I added it.

Wolfgang

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Re: 3SIDE imposition schema weirdness

[Wolfgang Schuster]

Am 10.06.2009 um 11:47 schrieb Nicolas Girard:

> * If so, I don't understand how can \dosetuparrangement{3}{1}{6}{4}{2}
> give 1|2|3 // 4|5|6 . What's the rationale ? Why no page 5 among the
> arguments of \dosetuparrangement ?

The placement of the pages is defined \pusharrangedpageTHREESIDE, the  
values
above mean:

• number of columns: 3
• number of rows: 1
• total number of pages: 6 (ConTeXt collects 6 pages and arrange them  
before
   they are written to the pdf file but in Willi's code 3 had been  
enough)
• number of crop marks in x direction: 4 (columns + 1)
• number of crop mark in y direction: 2 (rows + 1)

> * What if one wants to fold the resulting brochure ? How to adapt the
> code (besides by try and error) for the resulting arrangement to be
> 3|6|1 // 2|4|5 ?

The page order in a brochure is 5|6|1 and 2|3|4.

Wolfgang

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________