From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/32874 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Thomas A. Schmitz" Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: XeTeX questions Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:25:12 +0100 Message-ID: <290C1C94-2D75-4ED5-8C60-AC48B19323F8@uni-bonn.de> References: <45B37481.3050801@elvenkind.com> Reply-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169396756 2615 80.91.229.12 (21 Jan 2007 16:25:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:25:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Sun Jan 21 17:25:55 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl ([131.211.172.88] helo=ronja.ntg.nl) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H8fVr-00024p-6u for gctc-ntg-context-518@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:25:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983EC20027; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:20:57 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12594-09-4; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:20:51 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.vet.uu.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE642001F; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:20:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4073820006 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:20:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ronja.ntg.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.ntg.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 12594-09-3 for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:20:43 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com (mailout07.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.83]) by ronja.ntg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C06212001F for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:20:43 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from fwd27.aul.t-online.de by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1H8fVb-0002Nc-02; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:25:31 +0100 Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] (E4x1q0ZCYeqhmU0kdlL3fZQe2ClFYEqVeSs02CbqNIC1INOolRffZz@[84.172.88.189]) by fwd27.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1H8fVM-1l8USm0; Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:25:16 +0100 In-Reply-To: <45B37481.3050801@elvenkind.com> Original-To: mailing list for ConTeXt users X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-ID: E4x1q0ZCYeqhmU0kdlL3fZQe2ClFYEqVeSs02CbqNIC1INOolRffZz@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: cda7cde9-4bff-44bb-90b7-6cd22ea172bc X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl X-BeenThere: ntg-context@ntg.nl X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.7 Precedence: list List-Id: mailing list for ConTeXt users List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl Errors-To: ntg-context-bounces@ntg.nl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ntg.nl Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:32874 Archived-At: Uhm, maybe I wasn't quite clear: the entire TeX foundation is the current texlive head; I last sync'd on Jan 17. ConTeXt version is 2007.01.18. A look at the log doesn't reveal anything unusual, here's the beginning and end of the log file: This is XeTeXk, Version 3.141592-2.2-0.996 (Web2C 7.5.6) (INITEX) 21 JAN 2007 12:27 entering extended mode \write18 enabled. %&-line parsing enabled. (WARNING: translate-file "natural.tcx" ignored) ***cont-en (/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/tex/context/base/cont-en.tex (/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/tex/context/base/context.tex (/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/tex/context/base/syst-pln.tex [snip] (/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/tex/context/base/type-spe.tex) (/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/tex/context/base/type-akb.tex) (/usr/local/texlive/2007/../texmf-local/tex/context/base/type-xtx.tex)) ConTeXt ver: 2007.01.18 12:57 MKII fmt: 2007.1.21 int: english/ english Does that sound right? Best Thomas On Jan 21, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > In the latest context, this is a known problem. But the TeXlive > should be ok, so ypou have me a bit worried. Are you sure it was > the latest snapshot and it did not accidentally read one of the > non-tl files? > > Best, > > Taco