Re: 620 pages limit?

[Otared Kavian <otared@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3247 bytes --]

Hi,

For your information, just out of curiosity, I tested Wolfgang's code
\starttext
\count0=0
\loop\ifnum\count0<3986 % try 3987
  \advance\count0 by 1
  \shipout\vbox{}
\repeat
\end
\stoptext

which works fine with 3986 pages but not with 3987 pages and above.
This is with mkiv, version: 2011.02.25 22:03, and LuaTeX version beta-0.65.0-2010121316
on Mac OS X 10.6.6.

Best regards: OK

On 15 mars 2011, at 16:35, Taco Hoekwater wrote:

> On 03/15/2011 03:44 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
>> 
>> Am 15.03.2011 um 11:27 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Am 15.03.2011 um 10:07 schrieb Vnpenguin:
>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Best wishes,
>>>>>>> Taco
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Not here:
>>>>>> \starttext
>>>>>> \dorecurse{5000} {\input knuth \page }
>>>>>> \stoptext
>>>>>> pages>  flushing realpage 3987, userpage 3987
>>>>>> PANIC: unprotected error in call to Lua API (stack overflow (out of
>>>>>> stack space))
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> mtx-context     | fatal error: return code: 1
>>>>>> with latest minimals.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have exactely same error as you on Linux x86_64 CentOS , luatex
>>>>> beta-0.65.0-2010121316
>>>>> 
>>>>> However on my Windows XP (always with Minimals distro) I can compile
>>>>> without error. On Windows I have :
>>>>> E:\User\xxx\tex>luatex --version
>>>>> This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.66.0-2011021923 (Web2C 2010) (rev 4086)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Maybe luatex of Linux 64bit is out-of-date ?
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Just update luatex to beta-0.66.0-2011031509 (rev 4090) and now I got
>>>> 5000-pages PDF :)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I also updated now [got beta-0.66.0-2011031511 (rev 4090)]
>>> but still my project gives a PANIC!
>>> 
>>> I'll try now to boil down a minimal example out of my chapters ...
>> 
>> 
>> Four hours later:
>> Still I do not have a "minimal" example. But I think I have an idea what might be the problem:
>> The number of footnotes seems to have an impact.
>> I boiled it down to a version of my project where just a little additional note causes PANIC.
>> Adding another page of text or a sectioning heading or anything else is fine.
>> 
>> Does this help further finding the bug?
> 
> Not really, sorry. Unless the problem gets worse if you add extra footnotes earlier?
> 
>> Does it make sense to have compare both tuc files (the last working and the first buggy)?
> 
> Probably not.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Taco
> ___________________________________________________________________________________
> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
> 
> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
> webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
> archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
> wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
> ___________________________________________________________________________________

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Otared Kavian
Département de Mathématiques
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin
Bâtiment Fermat
45 avenue des Etats Unis
78035 Versailles cedex

Téléphone: +33 1 39 25 46 42
Secrétariat: +33 1 39 25 46 44 
Secrétariat: +33 1 39 25 46 46

e-mail: Otared.Kavian@math.uvsq.fr





[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 10371 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 486 bytes --]

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________