Re: Problem Citing a Definition

[Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfgang@googlemail.com>]

Am 31.01.2012 um 06:02 schrieb Kip Warner:

> Hey list,
> 
> I am trying to cite a definition typeset with a
> \startdefinition[definition:foo] and \stopdefinition pair. I am doing
> this by using a  \in{definition}[definition:foo]. That works, but in
> the text I just see linkable text "definition". 
> 
> I'd like it to be more descriptive of the physical location in the
> book, e.g. "foo in section 10.2". It was my impression according to the
> manual that it was suppose to already do that, or am I not using \in
> correctly?

The result of the \in command depends on the referenced object,
when you refer to a section or enumeration you get the number of
the section or enumeration but when you refer to something without
a number you get the stored text etc., e.g. \textreference[foo]{This is the text!}
print “This is the text!”.

For enumerations, floats etc. you can use the section number as prefix for
the objects own counter but there is no way AFAIK to get way you described.

Wolfgang

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________