* Bug? Cross referencing and \setuparranging
@ 2008-02-18 0:16 Jeff Smith
2008-02-18 10:42 ` Hans Hagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Smith @ 2008-02-18 0:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Hi,
There seems to be a bug with the current ConTeXt (2008.01.28).
When using \setuparranging (I've tried more than one setup),
cross-referencing doesn't work. You get ?? instead of whatever number
you should get. It happens to me with this simple dummy document:
\setuppapersize[A5][A3]
\setuparranging[2UP,doublesided]
\starttext
\chapter[chap1]{Chapter One}
\dorecurse{4}{\input knuth \par}
\chapter[chap2]{Chapter Two}
\dorecurse{4}{\input knuth \par}
\chapter[chap3]{Chapter Three}
In chapter \in[chap1] of this document, there was something to read.
\stoptext
If you comment out the \setuparranging command, the \in command will
work. If you don't, the log shows the following:
chapter : 3 Chapter Three
references : unknown reference [][chap1]
This looks like a bug?
Jeff
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug? Cross referencing and \setuparranging
2008-02-18 0:16 Bug? Cross referencing and \setuparranging Jeff Smith
@ 2008-02-18 10:42 ` Hans Hagen
2008-02-19 2:55 ` Jeff Smith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Hans Hagen @ 2008-02-18 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
Jeff Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There seems to be a bug with the current ConTeXt (2008.01.28).
>
> When using \setuparranging (I've tried more than one setup),
> cross-referencing doesn't work. You get ?? instead of whatever number
> you should get. It happens to me with this simple dummy document:
>
> \setuppapersize[A5][A3]
> \setuparranging[2UP,doublesided]
> \starttext
> \chapter[chap1]{Chapter One}
> \dorecurse{4}{\input knuth \par}
> \chapter[chap2]{Chapter Two}
> \dorecurse{4}{\input knuth \par}
> \chapter[chap3]{Chapter Three}
> In chapter \in[chap1] of this document, there was something to read.
> \stoptext
>
> If you comment out the \setuparranging command, the \in command will
> work. If you don't, the log shows the following:
>
> chapter : 3 Chapter Three
> references : unknown reference [][chap1]
>
> This looks like a bug?
no, just a side effect ... if you reshuffle the pages, you will get
different flushing of multipass data
(so, in fact you need to do normal runs, and then a final arrange run
with --once)
normally, you'll do:
texexec yourdoc --arrange
which will do normal runs followed by an extra run that arranges
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug? Cross referencing and \setuparranging
2008-02-18 10:42 ` Hans Hagen
@ 2008-02-19 2:55 ` Jeff Smith
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Smith @ 2008-02-19 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mailing list for ConTeXt users
On Feb 18, 2008 5:42 AM, Hans Hagen <pragma@wxs.nl> wrote:
>
> no, just a side effect ... if you reshuffle the pages, you will get
> different flushing of multipass data
>
> (so, in fact you need to do normal runs, and then a final arrange run
> with --once)
>
> normally, you'll do:
>
> texexec yourdoc --arrange
>
> which will do normal runs followed by an extra run that arranges
Oh, right. This sounds pretty logical.
Thanks!
Jeff
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-19 2:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-18 0:16 Bug? Cross referencing and \setuparranging Jeff Smith
2008-02-18 10:42 ` Hans Hagen
2008-02-19 2:55 ` Jeff Smith
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).