From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/515 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Arnold Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Cloning versus copying Date: Fri, 04 Jun 1999 23:44:15 -0700 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19990604234415.0084fdb0@mail.northcoast.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035391368 24618 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:42:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: ntg-context@ntg.nl Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:515 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:515 All, What's the difference between cloning and copying, as in the following file? %output=pdf \setupinteraction [state=start] \setupcolors [state=start] \tracefieldstrue \definesymbol[yes-a][$\times$] \definesymbol[yes-b][$\star$] \definesymbol[nop-a][$\bullet$] \definesymbol[nop-b][$-$] \definefield[example-1][radio][setup 1][ex-a,ex-b,ex-c][ex-c] \definesubfield[ex-a,ex-b,ex-c][setup 1][yes-a,nop-a] \setupfield [setup 1] [width=0.5cm,height=0.5cm,framecolor=red] \setupfield [setup 2] [width=.75cm,height=.75cm] \copyfield[ex-a][ex-x] \copyfield[ex-b][ex-y] \copyfield[ex-c][ex-z] \clonefield[ex-a][ex-p][setup 2][yes-b,nop-b] \clonefield[ex-b][ex-q][setup 2][yes-b,nop-b] \clonefield[ex-c][ex-r][setup 2][yes-b,nop-b] \showfields[example-1,ex-a,ex-b,ex-c,ex-x,ex-y,ex-z,ex-p,ex-q,ex-r] \starttext Hello, cruel world! \hbox{\field[ex-a]\field[ex-b]\field[ex-c]} \hbox{\field[ex-x]\field[ex-y]\field[ex-z]} Some more text. \hbox{\field[ex-p]\field[ex-q]\field[ex-r]} \stoptext I see no difference, and I can't think of a situation where I would want either of these behaviors. Why is it that when I click in ex-q, the fields ex-a,ex-b,ex-c, ex-z, ex-y, and ex-z revert to nop-a?