From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/3793 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Arnold Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Some preliminary difficulties Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:21:54 -0800 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010115182154.00b517f0@mail.northcoast.com> References: <4.3.2.7.0.20010112104640.00b1eb68@mail.northcoast.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035394510 20202 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:35:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Hans Hagen In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20010114232821.0092e720@server-1> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:3793 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:3793 Hans, >See attachment. > >(1) you really should use PDFETEX instead of pdftex, since PDFETEX reports >grouping problems and both your files had that. When a file is faulty, >texexec will not enter a second pass. OK. I am now using pdfetex at home. I'll switch at the office tomorrow. >(2) you should configure your editor (which one?) to do a symmetry check. >There is a missing \stop in book and a missing \stopexample in chapter1 I use WinEdt. As much as I like WinEdt, I keep hoping to see that editor you've talked about for Context. Someday. Anyhow, it seems that would aid in the solution of a lot of problems that occur. A common IDE would give us some common ground on which to communicate with you. >So, it's not that big a problem -) I need to find an efficient way to work on this project. If I recall, when you worked on the Metafun manual (I should say, when you are working on the Metafun manual), I would get pieces from time to time. This would be an indication that you work on the pieces separately before entering them in the main document. Could I hear some comments on this? I'd love to get some inkling on how the development of the Metafun manual was handled. Currently, we have this project arranged as follows: project ----> CollegeAlgebraText.tex product ----> book.tex component ----> Chapter1.tex I don't have any intent of crafting other products (at least I don't think so, but you may comment here if you see things to the contrary). I think that sections of each chapter will eventually average 10-20 pages in length. These are the basic components of development, the individual elements that we will work on from day to day. With this in mind, does this strategy seem better? project ----> CollegeAlgebraText.tex product ----> Chapter1.tex, Chapter2.tex, etc. component ----> Section1.tex, Section2.tex,.... of Chapter1.tex, Section1.tex, Section2.tex,.... of Chapter2.tex, etc. On my office Windows 2000 machine, when we compiled the present Chapter1.tex last week, it was a very long compile, with a number of windows opening and closing. I'd say easily over 2 minutes on a 700MHz machine to get the resulting 11 pages. My aide is just learning, so there will be a lot of write a little code, compile, write a little code, compile, etc, so a long compile like this will quickly frustrate her. How do I keep those windows from opening and closing (a lot of Metapost graphs are gonna be present in these files)? What kind of run should we do if we don't want to worry about the graphics, just see if the code compiles properly, etc.? Perhaps you can discuss some various compile strategies for efficient use of our time. Thanks.