ntg-context - mailing list for ConTeXt users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Arnold <darnold@northcoast.com>
Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl
Subject: Re: Objections pouring in.
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 11:15:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20010120111546.00b75aa0@mail.northcoast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10101201035050.3249-300000@fourier.math.tamu .edu>

Al,

P.S. It would be a better problem if we set 20% to 80% and 80% to 20%.

Also, if you could, can you compile these and send PS files. I need
something my students can read. It would be greatly appreciated.

 At 10:46 AM 1/20/01 -0600, you wrote:
>Dave,
>
>Yesterday, I sent you the maple-text
>versions of the answers to 2.2 and 2.3.
>These are plain ascii files which
>should be readable in any editor
>(you don't have to have maple on your machine).
>In this e-mail, I have attached both the 
>maple worksheet and the exported text version
>of the answers to section 2.4.
>I'm working on section 2.5 this weekend
>and should be able to send the answers
>to this section on Monday.
>
>Speaking of questions on the exercises,
>I'd be curious to know your opinion on
>Exercise 32 on page 42 of chapter 2
>(this may actually be exercise 33 since
>there appears to be two exercise 30s
>in this section). I don't understand this
>problem at all. There are two radioactive
>isotopes and the problem states "at first,
>20% of the decay comes from the one of the
>isotopes. Does this mean that the other 
>is not decaying? I'm totally perplexed
>by this problem. Evidently, the answer checking
>outfit in Mass. is also perplexed since
>they came up with a negative answer for time.
>Any light you can shed on this one would
>be appreciated.
>
>Al
>
>
>On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, David Arnold wrote:
>
>> John, Al, 
>> 
>> My students are raising questions on the exercises. For example, section
>> 2.3, exercise #1, page 50:
>> 
>> Ken and Adrienne ask: I don't think this problem is can be solved without
>> an more information. Should we assume that the vessel is at a dead stop?
>> That assumption would raise some interesting questions as well. If the
>> vessel is moving, are we to assume that the acceleration is in the same
>> direction as the
>> vessel's motion?
>> 
>> Exercise #5, same set: 
>> 
>> Adriene asks: "Near the surface of the earth?"
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>
>Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\sec2.4.mws"
>
>Attachment Converted: "c:\eudora\attach\sec2.4.txt"
>


           reply	other threads:[~2001-01-20 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <Pine.GSO.4.05.10101201035050.3249-300000@fourier.math.tamu .edu>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3.0.5.32.20010120111546.00b75aa0@mail.northcoast.com \
    --to=darnold@northcoast.com \
    --cc=ntg-context@ntg.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).