From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/1476 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: Building formats in private texmf tree Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2000 18:18:24 +0100 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20000103181824.00a0a420@pop.wxs.nl> References: <200001031141.MAA15563@PCI008A.nlr.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035392299 626 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 16:58:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 16:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: guravage@nlr.nl In-Reply-To: <200001031141.MAA15563@PCI008A.nlr.nl> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:1476 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:1476 At 12:41 PM 1/3/2000 +0100, Michael A. Guravage wrote: >This is true, but how do I convince texexec to write in my private and not the >system texmf tree? An alternative is to run `pdfetex -ini -efmt=cont-en >-progname=context cont-en.ini' for each format, but I suspect I am missing >something. Any suggestions? (1) make sure your texmf.cnf file is adapted to you new situation (see documentation of web2c) (2) you can influence texexec by adapting the texexec.ini file, although in tetex this is not needed; see texexec manual at our site. Hans ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.nl -----------------------------------------------------------------