From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2580 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: no more output with new beta Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 18:10:06 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20000901181006.00896c80@pop.wxs.nl> References: <3.0.6.32.20000901103525.019af8e0@pop.wxs.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393364 10039 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:16:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:16:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: Hraban In-Reply-To: <39AFC4E9.E95733EE@gmx.net> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2580 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2580 At 05:02 PM 9/1/00 +0200, you wrote: >Hans Hagen wrote: >> First, i strongly suggest that you update to pdftex version 14. >> Also, texexec is now 2.2, so did you copy texexec.pl to the right place? > >I thought it could be something like that... > >But in my /usr/bin I've only a symlink to the texexec app, so that it >should point to the right file. I'll check it. > >> There have been a few changes in texexec that have to do with handling mpost. > >I see: At first run of texexec there was something with mpost... texexec --make metafun should produce a metapost format file. Can you check that too? [see texexec.rme for more info] Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------