From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.comp.tex.context/2672 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Hagen Newsgroups: gmane.comp.tex.context Subject: Re: metafun Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 17:06:46 +0200 Sender: owner-ntg-context@let.uu.nl Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.20000912170646.008a3ab0@pop.wxs.nl> References: <3.0.6.32.20000912122645.01abd930@pop.wxs.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035393446 10825 80.91.224.250 (23 Oct 2002 17:17:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 17:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ntg-context@ntg.nl Original-To: "Robert F. Beeger" <5beeger@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.0.20000912152319.00b2ae30@rzdspc1.informatik.uni-h amburg.de> Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.comp.tex.context:2672 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.context:2672 At 03:41 PM 9/12/00 +0200, Robert F. Beeger wrote: >Hi! > >I browsed through it and what I saw looks fascinating. >It's worth a reading, I think. And surely it can be used as a reference >afterwards. >By the way : I found two typos at page 1. >"METAPOST on the other hand produces POSTSCRIPT code, which means that it >has some features not present in METAPOST and vise versa." >should be >"METAPOST on the other hand produces POSTSCRIPT code, which means that it >has some features not present in METAFONT and vice versa." > >Just a question: When will the next non-beta release of ConTeXt be released? >What makes the actual beta still a beta? Well, that was more than one >question. :) When nobody has problems I can promote it to non beta Hans ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------